National Association of Industrial Technology

Executive Board Meeting

April 14-15, 2000

 

Friday, April 14, 2000

Pittsburg City Center Marriott

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Present: Jerry Parish, Chair and Past President, University Division (Texas A&M University, Commerce); Sid Connor, President, CCTI Division; John Craft, President, Graphic Communications Division (Appalachian State University); Mark Franco, President, Student Division (Co-Venture Resources); Mr. Ed McGarry, Past President, CCTI Division (Gwinnett Technical Institute, Retired); Ron Meier, President, Manufacturing Division (Illinois State University); Art Rosser, President, University Division (Central Missouri State University); Executive Director Alvin Rudisill. Also present: Associate Director Dave Monforton (Recorder)

  1. Call to Order and Opening Remarks: The meeting was called to order by Chair Jerry Parish at 1:05 p.m. The Chair welcomed all those in attendance.
  2. Review and Approval of the Minutes: The Chair asked for a motion for approval of the minutes of the previous meeting. The members reviewed the minutes. It was moved by Connor and seconded by Franco that the minutes of the NAIT Executive Board Meeting of November 17, 1999 and November 20, 1999 be approved. The motion passed unanimously on a voice vote.
  3. Review and Approval of the Agenda: The Chair asked for a motion to approve the agenda. By consensus of the Board, the report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Membership was added to New Business, as item 9.e. It was moved by Franco and seconded by McGarry that the agenda be approved as revised. The motion passed unanimously on a voice vote.
  4. Reports from the NAIT Office: Rudisill reported on various items of NAIT business:

John Craft entered the meeting at 1:40 p.m.

Connor moved to accept and file the report, seconded by Franco. The motion was approved on a voice vote.

  1. Reports from Divisions:
    1. Industry Division: Due to absence of the Industry Division President, Tom Hjertquist, and Past President, John Reese, due to scheduling conflicts, Rudisill reviewed the written report submitted by Hjertquist (attached). Hjertquist's report noted the healthy increase to 457 members since November 1998, current status of distribution of the NAIT Student Recruitment CD-ROM and raised the issue of further production of the CD-ROM for discussion by the Board. McGarry moved to accept and file the report, seconded by Connor, and the motto was approved on a voice vote. The Board briefly discussed the Industry Division report and agreed to hold further discussion of the CD-ROM project until the New Business portion of the agenda.
    2. The meeting was recessed at 2 p.m. to allow a tour of the convention facilities that will be used at the 2000 NAIT Convention. The meeting was called back to order and resumed at 2:45 p.m.

    3. CCTI Division: Connor filed a written report (attached) and reviewed the major points, including discussion of accreditation of CCTI institutions, which is being pushed in Alabama, Virginia and Missouri due to a legislative mandate. Connor expressed hope that NAIT support for these accreditation efforts will result in increased CCTI accreditation and professional memberships. Connor also reviewed the status of actions on CCTI goals. Past President McGarry noted the effort to contact past CCTI members, but that responses to the mailing were very small and inconclusive. Meier moved to accept and file the report, seconded by Franco, and the motion was approved on a voice vote.
    4. Student Division: Franco filed a written report (attached) and reported that primary activity has been his effort to update the IT/IQ Contest by transfer of questions to projectable format and in development of new questions. He recruited Board members to assist in development of questions, and several Board members volunteered. The Student Division is also exploring a Student Scholarship award to be initiated for the 2001 Conference. Other efforts for the 2000 Conference include:

Franco moved to accept and file the report, seconded by Parish, and the motion was approved on a voice vote.

    1. University Division: Rosser filed a written report (attached) and reported that activity to achieve goals is underway. Rosser reported revised numerical goals with respect to membership, certification and accreditation. Rosser moved to accept and file the report, seconded by Connor, and the motion was approved on a voice vote.
    2. Graphic Communications Division: Craft filed a written report (attached) and reviewed the Division's effort at promoting membership. He reported that the Graphic Arts Technical Foundation will provide a tour of their headquarters facility near Pittsburgh during the 2000 Convention, along with offering training opportunities. The Division plans to again produce a "mini-program" highlighting the Graphic Communications presentations at the 2000 Conference. Meier moved to accept and file the report, seconded by parish, and the motion was approved on a voice vote.
    3. Manufacturing Systems Division: Meier filed a written report (attached) and reviewed the Manufacturing Systems Division membership promotion efforts. He noted that the report includes a current roster of members. He went on to review plans for the Divisions all-day program for the first day of the 2000 Conference, and mentioned the beginning of an effort to establish a repository of manufacturing curricula. Meier moved to accept and file the report, seconded by parish, and the motion was approved on a voice vote.
  1. Reports from Boards:
    1. Board of Accreditation: Rudisill noted the need to recruit a new chair for the Board of Accreditation who would be designated at the 2000 conference for a term to begin at the close of the 2001 Conference.
    2. Board of Certification: Rudisill reported on the efforts of the Chair, Dr. Dennis Field, to reinvigorate the Board, to establish a policy review committee similar to the Standards and Accreditation Committee of the Board of Accreditation, and that suggestions regarding Board or Committee personnel should be forwarded to Dr. Field.
    3. NAIT Foundation Board: Rudisill reported on the effort to wrap up the Institutional Charter Membership campaign by recruiting a total of 40 institutions by the 2000 Conference, to double the 20 Institutions who have joined thus far.
  1. Reports from Committees:
    1. Public Relations Committee: John Reese, member of the committee and Past President of the Industry Division, though absent from the meeting, filed a written report on the CD-ROM project. No discussion was undertaken as the CD-ROM Project was set for discussion under new business. Motion by Rosser to accept and file the report, seconded by Parish, and the motion was approved on a voice vote.
    2. Ad Hoc Committee on Membership Policy: Connor, chair of the committee, filed a written report on behalf of the committee (attached). By way of introduction, Connor reviewed the charge of the committee to look at potential changes in the institutional membership policy that could generate more professional memberships in NAIT. He noted that the committee desired to not negatively impact membership dues revenue and that they tried to devise a recommendation that was sensitive to differences in the sizes of institutions. He then briefly reviewed the report, noting that it recommended various levels of institutional membership at different fee levels that would include designation of various numbers of individuals as professional members of NAIT as a result of an institution obtaining an institutional membership. Connor moved to accept and file the report, seconded by Parish.

Discussion ensued. Connor noted that CCTI institutions, in particular, are increasingly unable to pay professional memberships for their faculty, but that many such institutions may pay for institutional memberships. Rosser noted that in Missouri, state law prohibits the purchase of individual memberships by state institutions and that he understood that also to prohibit purchase of an individual membership through the purchase of an institutional membership. Discussion continued with other Board members noting institutional policies prohibiting purchase of individual memberships, however they may be "packaged." Various suggestions were made for alternative proposals. Concern was expressed as to impact on existing professional and institutional memberships if a change was made as suggested by the committee report. The Board agreed to take no action at the present time. The motion to accept and file the report was approved on a voice vote.

  1. Old Business:
    1. Outstanding Industrial Technologist Award - Guidelines and Funding: Rudisill reported on OIT funding, noting that though funding has been pledged by Industry Division President Tom Hjertquist for the 2000 Conference, but that there is no long term funding strategy in place. Rudisill also stated that he believed there is a need to expand criteria for the award to include industrial technologists who have made a career in education administration as they do not currently fall under purview of OIT Award or the divisional Outstanding Professor and Faculty awards. The Board discussed various ideas for continued funding of the OIT Award and for addressing award eligibility for industrial technologists in education administration.
    2. By consensus, the Board agreed to put over item 8.B., Strategic Planning, and to take it up when the Board meeting resumes on Saturday, April 15.

    3. Location Guidelines and Selection of Future Convention Sites: Rudisill reported that efforts at obtaining a reasonable proposal from sites in Las Vegas, Nevada for 2001, which included site visits to three properties, were not met with success. All proposals included charges for meeting rooms and lodging room rates significantly above those recommended by the Board (up to $125/night) and did not include weekend dates. Rudisill reported on other proposals:

Rosser moved, seconded by Franco, that the NAIT Office pursue an agreement for Dearborn, Michigan for the 2001 Conference and Panama City, Florida for the 2002 Conference. Some Board members further suggested that the NAIT Office investigate a Midwest site for the 2003 Conference.

Moved by Rosser, seconded by Craft that the Board meeting be recessed until Saturday, April 15, 2000 at 8 a.m. The motion was approved on a voice vote.

The meeting was recessed at 5:45 p.m.